New to shockwave or in pain for more than 3 months? Book a Telehealth to see if we can help you!
If you’re dealing with Golfer’s Elbow, you’ve probably done the “responsible” things: you rested, you iced, you stretched, you tried physiotherapy, maybe you changed your grip or stopped the sport you love… and yet the pain is still there. That “sting” on the inside of your elbow shows up when you pour coffee, carry groceries, train at the gym, or swing a club—like your body is reminding you that you’re not fully back.
This is often the moment people start searching for shockwave therapy—not because they want a trendy gadget, but because they want a non-surgical treatment that still feels like a real plan. Research suggests extracorporeal shockwave therapy may help stubborn tendon pain (especially when symptoms have become “stuck”), though results vary and not every study shows the same effect.
Important note: This article is educational, not individualized medical advice. Results may vary; always consult a healthcare provider.
Golfer’s Elbow is the everyday name for medial epicondylitis—pain and sensitivity around the bony bump on the inside of the elbow where the wrist‑flexor and forearm‑pronator tendons attach. In plain language: it’s usually not the “joint” that’s the problem—it’s the tendon attachment getting overloaded and irritated over time.
Even though people hear “golf” and assume it only happens to golfers, the condition can also build up in people who grip, carry, pull, lift, type, climb, or do repetitive work.
A lot of people assume tendon pain should behave like a simple strain: rest for a few weeks and it goes away. But with longer‑lasting elbow tendinopathy, the story is often different. In chronic presentations, research commonly describes more of a degenerative/tendinosis‑type picture (changes in tendon structure and failed healing) rather than a short, clean inflammatory flare—one reason “anti‑inflammatories + rest” can feel disappointing.
That helps explain why many people end up in a frustrating loop:
You stop the activity because it hurts.
It calms down… a little.
You return to normal life or sport.
The pain snaps back, because the tendon never truly regained capacity.
In a systematic review looking at shockwave therapy across upper‑limb tendon conditions, authors describe standard conservative care as including rest, activity modification, stretching, NSAIDs, and eccentric loading—helpful foundations, but not always enough for every stubborn case.
If you’ve searched online and found confident claims, here’s the reality: direct research on shockwave therapy specifically for Golfer’s Elbow is more limited than research on the closely related “tennis elbow” (lateral epicondylitis). A BJSM systematic review that set out to cover both medial and lateral epicondylitis reported that, in the trials they ultimately included, all RCTs were on lateral epicondylitis, and they explicitly concluded: “No studies were found” for medial epicondylitis within their included evidence at that time.
That doesn’t mean shockwave therapy can’t help Golfer’s Elbow. It means we should talk about it with the right balance: best available evidence + realistic uncertainty.
A randomized trial in newly diagnosed medial or lateral epicondylitis compared low‑energy extracorporeal shockwave therapy to local steroid injection. The ESWT protocol in that study was roughly 2,000 impulses, low energy flux density 0.06–0.12 mJ/mm², delivered three times over three weeks (weekly sessions). Both groups improved over follow‑up, and by later follow‑ups the groups looked more similar—suggesting ESWT can be a viable option, especially when steroid injection is undesirable.
A more recent randomized controlled trial focused on medial epicondylitis compared PRP injection versus extracorporeal shockwave therapy in 54 patients. Both groups improved in pain (VAS) and function (Mayo Elbow Performance Score) at 12 weeks and 24 weeks, but the PRP group improved more by 6 months. The authors still concluded both approaches appeared safe and effective, with PRP showing superiority in that study.
So, if your question is: “Is shockwave therapy for Golfer’s Elbow evidence-based?”—the most accurate answer is:
Yes, there is direct clinical trial evidence that it can improve pain and function, but
the research base is smaller than for tennis elbow, and
it may not outperform every other intervention in every study (for example, PRP in one RCT).
Tennis elbow and golfer’s elbow are different sides of the elbow, but both are overuse‑related tendon attachment problems. Because lateral epicondylitis has a much larger shockwave evidence base, clinicians often use it as a “closest match” when setting expectations—while still being transparent that it’s not identical.
High-level syntheses of lateral epicondylitis research show a mixed but increasingly supportive picture for pain outcomes:
A 2025 umbrella review of meta-analyses concluded that ESWT can reduce pain versus placebo and may outperform ultrasound therapy and corticosteroid injection on pain outcomes in lateral epicondylitis (with some outcomes showing no clinically important difference, and substantial heterogeneity in places).
A 2022 systematic review and network meta-analysis (40 RCTs) found ESWT outperformed placebo for short‑term and medium‑term pain, and it ranked highest for grip strength recovery among compared non-surgical options; corticosteroid injection was not recommended in that analysis.
A 2024 meta-analysis of ESWT across multiple tendinopathies (45 clinical studies) found statistically significant pain reductions across several conditions; for lateral epicondylitis specifically, the pooled estimate also favored ESWT for pain reduction, though heterogeneity was notable.
At the same time, not every review is positive. A 2023 systematic review/meta-analysis in JSES International found that—in the pooled analysis of two trials—ESWT showed no benefit compared with no active treatment for pain or function in lateral epicondylitis, and the authors concluded evidence did not support ESWT in that context.
What this means for you (in plain language): shockwave therapy is not “magic,” and study results depend heavily on protocol, device type, energy, dosage, chronicity, and comparison group. But overall, for stubborn tendon pain, there is credible research support—especially for lateral elbow tendinopathy—and emerging/direct support for medial epicondylitis.
Shockwave therapy (often called extracorporeal shockwave therapy, or ESWT) delivers high‑energy acoustic pulses to targeted tissues. In a systematic review of upper-limb ESWT, the authors summarize several proposed mechanisms that can be explained simply:
It may stimulate a healing response through controlled micro‑stress and biological signaling (the exact mechanism is not fully settled).
It may influence pain through nociceptor hyperstimulation / gate-control style mechanisms, altering pain transmission and increasing local pain‑inhibiting substances.
Some mechanistic explanations include vascular and tissue-regeneration signaling (often discussed as neovascularization and growth factor up‑regulation), again described as hypotheses supported by experimental and clinical observations rather than a single “proven” pathway.
Because evidence varies, the right expectation is not “one session cures it.” The more realistic expectation is: a structured course and then reassessment based on response.
In the epicondylitis RCT that included medial cases, ESWT was delivered weekly for three sessions (three weeks), with outcomes improving over the subsequent weeks.
In the medial epicondylitis RCT comparing PRP to ESWT, outcomes were tracked at 12 and 24 weeks, and both groups improved—suggesting changes can continue over months, not just days.
What many clients feel during and after treatment typically fits this pattern (and matches what trials often allow for):
During: a rapid tapping/pulsing sensation; tenderness varies by person and tissue sensitivity.
After: possible short-term soreness, then gradual improvement across weeks as function builds (not always linear).
Reminder: there are no guarantees. Your response can depend on symptom duration, tendon load demands, and whether the true driver is only local tendon overload or part of a broader movement/strength pattern.
When you’re the client, what you usually want is simple: “Tell me what’s going on, and give me a plan that finally moves the needle.”
At Unpain Clinic, shockwave therapy is positioned as the main modality for stubborn tendon problems—while still acknowledging you’re not just an elbow. The clinic discusses this whole‑body, root‑cause mindset on the Unpain Clinic Podcast, including how pain in one area can relate to issues elsewhere in the kinetic chain.
Before shockwave therapy begins, the goal is to clarify:
Is this truly medial epicondylitis (tendon attachment pain), or something else mimicking it?
What loads flare it: gripping, wrist flexion/pronation, pulling, impact, or repetitive work?
What’s keeping it chronic: technique, training dosage, strength deficits upstream, scar tissue history, or recovery bottlenecks?
On the Unpain Clinic Podcast episode “Pain and Beyond Exploring the Body’s Complexities” (07/18/2024), the conversation highlights this “whole system” thinking and includes discussion of shockwave therapy’s role in addressing stubborn tissues rather than only chasing symptoms.
From a client perspective, a good session is not a mysterious “machine appointment.” You should understand what’s being targeted and why.
In the RCT that included medial epicondylitis, clinicians applied shockwaves to the point of greatest tenderness and adjusted dose if pain tolerance was an issue (for example, reducing impulses in the first week if pain was severe).
That fits a practical, client-centered approach: enough intensity to stimulate change, not so much that you dread coming back.
A common research pattern for elbow tendinopathy is weekly sessions for about three sessions (with many real‑world plans adjusting based on irritability and chronicity).
And because outcomes in medial epicondylitis trials were still improving at 12–24 weeks, a good plan also includes follow-up benchmarks rather than judging success only by how you feel the next morning.
If you like to learn before you commit, here are Unpain Clinic resources where shockwave therapy is discussed in plain language:
Podcast: “Why Cortisone Shots May Not Be Your Best Bet! Exploring Alternative Therapies for Pain Relief” (07/26/2024) — includes discussion of shockwave therapy as an alternative approach when injections are being considered.
Podcast: “Pain and Beyond Exploring the Body’s Complexities” (07/18/2024) — discusses whole‑body assessment logic and where shockwave therapy fits for stubborn pain patterns.
YouTube: “Unpain Method Of Shockwave Therapy” (published ~mid‑2023; YouTube lists “2 years ago” in accessible preview) — a short overview of the clinic’s shockwave approach.
YouTube Shorts: “#shorts What True Shockwave Therapy Means” (published ~late January 2026; YouTube lists “2 weeks ago” at time of access) — focuses on what “medical‑grade” shockwave actually means and why quality/parameters matter.
Because YouTube sometimes displays relative dates (“2 weeks ago”) rather than an exact day in certain previews, the dates above are approximate based on what was accessible at the time of research.
For additional internal Unpain Clinic reading, you may also find these pages useful:
Shockwave Therapy service overview
Clinic FAQ about shockwave differences and common questions
General elbow pain + shockwave overview
Imagine this scenario (de‑identified and illustrative, not a guarantee):
You’re a 41‑year‑old recreational golfer and gym‑goer. For four months, the inside of your elbow hurts every time you grip a dumbbell, carry a bag, or swing. You rested for two weeks, it eased, then came back. You did basic physio exercises, but progress plateaued.
In your assessment, you learn two key things:
The tendon is reactive and weak under load (classic medial epicondylitis presentation).
Your daily grip demands (work + training) keep re‑irritating it; “rest” isn’t truly reducing load enough to let the tendon reset.
You start a structured course of shockwave therapy for Golfer’s Elbow, modeled on common research dosing patterns (often weekly sessions over several weeks), with load modifications between visits.
By week 2–3, your pain is not gone—but it’s less sharp and settles faster after activity. Over the next 6–12 weeks, function improves more noticeably: you can train with smarter loading and swing with fewer “aftershocks.” That longer timeline is consistent with trials that track improvement out to 12 and 24 weeks rather than expecting instant results.
Again: this is an example, not a promise.
This section is general education only—not medical advice.
Between sessions, your job is to stop re‑injuring the tendon while still keeping the arm moving. In upper-limb tendinopathy care, commonly described conservative elements include activity modification, stretching, and progressive loading (e.g., eccentric-focused work)—often used alongside other treatments.
Practical, generally safe ideas many people use:
Reduce the “peak grip” moments for a few weeks (heavy carries, max pull-ups, thick-handled deadlifts). You’re not “quitting,” you’re creating space for tissue change.
Stay active, but scale smart: choose pain‑calm alternatives (straps for certain lifts, lighter loads, higher reps, neutral wrist positions).
Gentle forearm mobility: slow wrist flexion/extension and pronation/supination in a comfortable range.
Progressive strengthening (not random stretching): if you’ve only done stretching, you may need a more structured loading plan—especially in chronic tendinosis‑type presentations.
Seek urgent medical care if you have severe swelling after trauma, rapidly worsening neurological symptoms (numbness/weakness), fever with redness, or any concerning systemic symptoms.
Clinical studies and systematic reviews commonly describe ESWT as a non-invasive option with a generally favorable safety profile in upper-limb tendon conditions, though outcomes vary and not every protocol works the same way.
In epicondylitis research, studies often exclude people with conditions that could increase risk (for example pregnancy, bleeding/hemostatic disorders, malignancy, systemic or local infection, or pacemakers), reflecting standard screening precautions.
Many elbow protocols in clinical research use a short course of weekly treatments, commonly around three sessions, then reassess response.
However, because medial epicondylitis trials measure meaningful changes at 12–24 weeks, it’s more realistic to think in phases: initial sessions, then a longer window where tissues adapt and function rebuilds.
It can be uncomfortable, especially right over a sensitive tendon attachment. In one epicondylitis RCT, clinicians adjusted the number of impulses in the first week if pain tolerance was an issue—suggesting discomfort is expected and should be managed, not ignored.
Chronic cases are exactly why many people look into shockwave. Research on tendinopathies and lateral elbow tendinopathy supports pain reduction in many studies, but results are mixed across reviews.
For medial epicondylitis specifically, at least one RCT shows ESWT can improve pain and function over months, though it may not outperform other interventions like PRP in every study.
This depends on individual medical factors and device type, so your provider should screen you. In epicondylitis research, common exclusion criteria include pregnancy, bleeding/hemostatic disorders, malignancy, systemic infection or local infection, and pacemakers—useful “red flag” categories to discuss with your clinician.
Coverage varies widely by plan and region. The safest next step is to ask your insurer what they cover and ask the clinic for billing support and documentation.
Most people describe temporary soreness during or after treatment. Trials also note that treatment parameters are adjusted for tolerance and safety, and systematic reviews generally describe ESWT as safe when applied appropriately.
Golfer’s Elbow can feel personal—because it steals normal life: lifting, training, sport, work, even shaking hands. And when rest and standard physiotherapy haven’t ended the cycle, it’s normal to want something more targeted than “wait and see.”
Based on the best available evidence, shockwave therapy for Golfer’s Elbow is a credible non-surgical treatment option that may reduce pain and improve function—supported by direct randomized trial evidence in medial epicondylitis, and stronger (but still mixed) evidence in the closely related tennis elbow research.
It’s not a guarantee. But it is a reasonable next step when your elbow has become stubborn and you want a plan built around measurable progress, not guesswork.
At Unpain Clinic, we don’t just ask “Where does it hurt?” — we uncover “Why does it hurt?”
If you’ve been frustrated by the cycle of “try everything, feel nothing,” this assessment is for you. We take a whole-body approach so you leave with clarity, not more questions.
✅ What’s Included
Comprehensive history & goal setting
Orthopedic & muscle testing (head-to-toe)
Motion analysis
Imaging decisions (if needed)
Pain pattern mapping
Personalized treatment roadmap
Benefit guidance
🕑 Important Details
60 minutes, assessment only
No treatment in this visit
👩⚕️ Who You’ll See
A licensed Registered Physiotherapist or Chiropractor
🔜 What Happens Next
If you’re a fit, we schedule your first treatment and start executing your plan.
🌟 Why Choose Unpain Clinic
Whole-body assessment, not symptom-chasing
Root-cause focus, not temporary relief
Non-invasive where possible
No long-term upsells — just honest, effective care
🎯 Outcome
You’ll walk out knowing:
What’s wrong
Why it hurts
The fastest path to fix it
Author: Uran Berisha, BSc PT, RMT, Shockwave Expert
1. Lee SS, et al. Effectiveness of Initial Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy on the Newly Diagnosed Lateral or Medial Epicondylitis. Ann Rehabil Med. 2012.
2. Singh SA, et al. Effectiveness of ultrasound guided platelet rich plasma injection in comparison with extracorporeal shock wave therapy on improving pain and function in medial epicondylitis of elbow: a randomized controlled trial. International Journal of Advances in Medicine. 2024.
3. Dingemanse R, et al. Evidence for the effectiveness of electrophysical modalities for treatment of medial and lateral epicondylitis: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med. 2014.
4. Testa G, et al. Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy Treatment in Upper Limb Diseases: A Systematic Review. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2020.
5. Majidi L, et al. The effect of extracorporeal shock-wave therapy on pain in patients with various tendinopathies: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials. BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation. Published 24 April 2024.
6. Liu WC, et al. Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy Shows Superiority Over Injections for Pain Relief and Grip Strength Recovery in Lateral Epicondylitis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis. Arthroscopy. 2022.
7. Cheema AS, et al. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) in lateral epicondylitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JSES International. 2023.
8. Zhu P, et al. Comparison of extracorporeal shockwave therapy, ultrasound therapy, and corticosteroid injections for treatment of lateral epicondylitis: an umbrella review of meta-analyses. Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology. Published 18 August 2025.
9. Unpain Clinic Podcast: Pain and Beyond Exploring the Body’s Complexities (07/18/2024).
10. Unpain Clinic Podcast: Why Cortisone Shots May Not Be Your Best Bet! Exploring Alternative Therapies for Pain Relief (07/26/2024).
11. Unpain Clinic YouTube: Unpain Method Of Shockwave Therapy (published ~mid‑2023; displayed as “2 years ago” in accessible preview).
12. Unpain Clinic YouTube Shorts: #shorts What True Shockwave Therapy Means (published ~late January 2026; displayed as “2 weeks ago” in accessible preview).
