New to shockwave or in pain for more than 3 months? Book a Telehealth to see if we can help you!
If you’re living with Facet Joint Syndrome, you already know how draining it is: you can be “careful,” do the right stretches, get temporary relief… and still feel that same deep, stubborn back pain return. When back pain becomes chronic, it’s not just discomfort—it affects sleep, mood, confidence in movement, and everyday freedom.
One evidence-informed, non-surgical treatment that’s gaining real momentum for this specific pain generator is shockwave therapy (also called extracorporeal shockwave therapy, or ESWT). Unlike many surface-level approaches, shockwave therapy can be applied with a precision and depth that makes it especially relevant when the source of pain is a small, irritated joint deep in the spine—like the lumbar facet joints.
This article is written for Unpain Clinic patients who want an honest, research-backed explanation of why facet pain is so persistent—and how shockwave therapy may help.
Important note: This is education, not medical advice. Results may vary; always consult a healthcare provider.
Facet joints (also called zygapophyseal joints) are paired joints at the back of each spinal segment. They help guide motion and contribute to spinal stability. When these joints become irritated—often through overload, repetitive extension/rotation, or degenerative changes—pain can become persistent and “stuck.”
Facet Joint Syndrome is typically discussed as “facet-mediated” or “facetogenic” pain. In the best studies on shockwave therapy for lumbar facet pain, participants were not just labeled based on symptoms; they were confirmed to have facet joint pain using a diagnostic medial branch block (a procedure that temporarily numbs the nerves that supply the facet joint—helping confirm the joint as the pain source).
In the research, chronic facet pain is framed as more than a simple “strain.” Facet joints can develop degenerative and inflammatory changes that keep the joint and surrounding tissues sensitized. The 2025 randomized sham-controlled trial also highlights that facet-related pain can include both nociceptive (“tissue irritation”) and neuropathic-like features (“nerve pain qualities”), which helps explain why the pain sometimes feels outsized compared to what you “did.”
Many people with chronic facet joint pain go through some version of the following cycle:
rest + “waiting it out”
repeated use of anti-inflammatories or pain meds
general exercise or therapy that isn’t specific enough to the true pain driver
short-term relief from passive modalities that doesn’t last
conversations that escalate toward injections or more invasive procedures
Even the earlier comparative study on facet pain notes that interventional procedures (like injections or radiofrequency medial branch neurotomy) exist as common options—but they also come with tradeoffs and are not always the best first answer for every person.
The strongest way to answer “Does shockwave therapy help Facet Joint Syndrome?” is to look for trials that actually studied lumbar facet joint pain specifically (not just general back pain). Good news: that evidence now exists—though it’s still a relatively small body of research and needs continued replication.
A 2025 randomized, sham-controlled clinical trial evaluated high-energy focused shockwave therapy (focused ESWT) in 128 patients with chronic lumbar facet syndrome confirmed by medial branch block.
Key details that matter if you’re deciding whether shockwave therapy is worth your time:
Treatment plan used in the study: 5 weekly sessions of focused ESWT (1200 shocks per session; 600 shocks per treated segment; energy reported as 0.35 mJ/mm²).
Outcomes measured: pain intensity (VAS), disability (Oswestry Disability Index), neuropathic pain features (PainDETECT), and MRI changes.
Results: the focused ESWT group showed meaningful improvements in pain and disability at follow-ups up to 12 months, and neuropathic pain features improved in the treatment group (not the sham group).
Imaging finding (not just symptom change): MRI follow-up showed resolution of bone marrow edema in a portion of treated patients, while none in the sham group showed that change.
Safety: no adverse effects were reported in this trial.
What this means in plain language: in a properly designed study—where facet pain was confirmed and a sham group was used—focused shockwave therapy showed sustained improvement in pain and function. That’s exactly the kind of evidence patients with stubborn facet pain have been missing for years.
Before the 2025 trial, a peer-reviewed 2014 comparative evaluation looked at shockwave therapy for chronic unilateral lumbar facet joint pain in 62 patients, comparing:
radial shockwave therapy (SWT)
guided steroid facet injections
radiofrequency medial branch neurotomy (RMBN)
Important takeaways:
The shockwave group received 5 weekly sessions, with dosing described using a radial device (3,000 shocks per session; energy flux density approximately 0.12 mJ/mm²), with initial ultrasound guidance to orient the applicator.
Pain (VAS) improved across groups early on, but at longer follow-up the injection group tended to lose momentum, while shockwave and neurotomy maintained more sustained benefits.
The authors summarize shockwave therapy as showing better long-term results than injections and slightly inferior to radiofrequency neurotomy, with no serious adverse effects observed in the shockwave group.
They also acknowledge a key limitation: radial shockwave has depth/energy constraints in deeper spinal structures—one reason later research moved toward focused shockwave for facet joints.
This older study is not as strong as a sham-controlled RCT, but it’s still clinically useful because it:
directly studied facet-mediated pain, and 2) provides real-world comparisons to common interventional pathways.
Facet Joint Syndrome is one contributor to the broad category of chronic low back pain, but not all chronic low back pain is facet-driven. So results from general chronic low back pain studies cannot be assumed to apply perfectly to facet pain.
That said, higher-level evidence in chronic low back pain does suggest shockwave therapy can reduce pain and improve function in spine-related pain populations:
A 2023 systematic review and meta-analysis (12 RCTs, 632 patients) found ESWT produced greater short-term pain relief and functional improvement than comparator treatments, with no serious adverse effects reported in pooled trials.
A 2024 systematic review focused specifically on focused ESWT for low back pain noted that only a small number of focused-ESWT RCTs were available up to April 2024, and protocols varied—so conclusions should be cautious, even though the modality appears promising.
A 2022 randomized controlled trial in chronic low back pain compared different ESWT dosing regimens and found that—under the same total energy dose—lower intensity delivered across more sessions produced better short-term improvements than higher intensity with fewer sessions, and no notable shockwave-related side effects occurred in either group.
Bottom line: Facet Joint Syndrome now has direct RCT evidence, and broader chronic low back pain literature supports shockwave therapy’s potential role as an evidence-informed, non-invasive option—especially when standard care has plateaued.
“Shockwave therapy” can sound intense, but the concept is straightforward: a device delivers controlled acoustic energy from outside the body into targeted tissues. In facet-related pain studies, shockwave therapy is positioned as a way to influence deeper musculoskeletal structures non-invasively.
Research on facet pain highlights several clinically relevant effects:
Facet pain can involve both local tissue irritation and nerve-related pain qualities. In the 2025 sham-controlled trial, neuropathic pain features improved in the focused ESWT group. That matters, because many people with stubborn back pain feel burning, sharp, or “electric” symptoms mixed with mechanical pain.
The 2014 paper also discusses shockwave therapy in the context of mechanotransduction (how mechanical stimulation can trigger biological responses) and references desensitization effects observed in related research threads—supporting the plausibility of a pain-modulating effect.
One reason the 2025 trial drew attention is that it didn’t only track pain scores—it also tracked MRI changes. Resolution of bone marrow edema in treated facet regions suggests there may be a biological correlate of improvement in at least a subset of patients.
That does not mean shockwave therapy “heals everyone’s spine” or reverses all arthritis. It does mean the best available facet-specific RCT found more than placebo symptom reporting—there were measurable changes consistent with reduced inflammatory activity in the treated region for some patients.
The facet-specific RCT concludes focused ESWT was safe and effective in their trial and frames it as a promising non-invasive alternative to interventional procedures.
And the comparative evaluation suggests shockwave therapy showed sustained benefit compared with facet injections (while being slightly less effective than radiofrequency neurotomy), again positioning it as a legitimate conservative option.
This is where many articles get overly salesy. Let’s keep it clinical and realistic.
Facet-specific research used weekly sessions:
Focused ESWT RCT (2025): 5 weekly sessions.
Radial SWT comparative study (2014): 5 weekly sessions.
In broader chronic low back pain research, dosing and schedules vary, but trial designs reinforce a key point: effective care is typically delivered as a course, not a one-off visit.
Most people describe shockwave therapy as a fast tapping or pulsing sensation. Some areas can feel tender—especially where tissues are irritated. The goal is therapeutic stimulation, not unbearable pain. (Your provider should adjust intensity appropriately.)
Some people feel a lift within a few sessions. Others notice progress more gradually—often as:
better tolerance to standing/walking
less sharp pain at end-range movement
fewer flare-ups after daily tasks
improved confidence bending, turning, or getting up from sitting
In the facet-specific RCT, outcomes were assessed out to 12 months, highlighting that improvements can be sustained—but that does not mean everyone responds the same way.
Even in strong studies, not every person responds equally. The right interpretation is:
shockwave therapy can help, based on current evidence
it’s not guaranteed
response depends on factors like chronicity, sensitivity, movement patterns, health background, and whether facet pain is the true primary driver
Results may vary; always consult a healthcare provider.
At Unpain Clinic, shockwave therapy isn’t treated like a “machine appointment.” It’s used as the main treatment modality inside a structured clinical process designed to answer two questions:
Is this truly facet-mediated pain?
If yes, what is keeping it stuck?
That second piece matters because persistent back pain is rarely just “one tight spot.” In our educational content, we consistently emphasize whole-body patterning—how old injuries, scars, and compensations can keep spinal joints overloaded.
Assessment (first visit):
We look at posture, movement patterns, provocation tests, and the full kinetic chain that can load the lumbar spine. This is the “why does it hurt?” approach—not just chasing the pain site.
Shockwave therapy sessions (main treatment):
Your provider applies shockwave therapy to clinically relevant tissues related to facet loading—commonly including deeper paraspinal regions and adjacent structures that influence spinal mechanics. Dosing and tolerance are individualized, but evidence-informed protocols commonly involve weekly sessions in an initial block.
Supportive work (kept brief, because shockwave stays central):
You may receive simple, targeted movement guidance to reduce flare triggers and help your body “use” the improved tissue capacity you’re building.
For patients who want deeper education, these Unpain Clinic Podcast episodes are particularly relevant:
Unpain Podcast Episode #16: “Why Cortisone Shots May Not Be Your Best Bet! Exploring Alternative Therapies for Pain Relief” (July 26, 2024) — discusses limitations of symptom-only approaches and positions shockwave therapy as a conservative alternative.
Unpain Podcast Episode #15: “Pain and Beyond Exploring the Body’s Complexities” (July 18, 2024) — emphasizes whole-body drivers of pain and how shockwave therapy is used to address restrictions (including scar-related restrictions) that can contribute to chronic pain patterns.
Each episode page also links to the YouTube video version (“Watch video on YouTube”), so you can watch instead of listen.
A 46-year-old desk worker has had right-sided low back pain for 14 months. It flares with prolonged standing, repeated extension (like reaching overhead), and long drives. They’ve tried rest, massage, and general core exercises. They can “manage,” but the pain always returns, and workouts feel risky.
After a full assessment, the working hypothesis is facet-driven pain with significant protective muscle guarding and poor hip contribution, keeping the lumbar spine overactive. A plan is created where shockwave therapy is the primary intervention, delivered once per week for an initial block (similar to research schedules), with simple at-home movement “rules” to prevent repeated flare triggers.
Over several weeks, they notice fewer sharp spikes and improved tolerance to standing. After completing the initial course, they can return to longer walks and gym sessions with fewer setbacks. They still have to respect recovery—but they finally feel like the pain is moving in the right direction.
In the best available facet-specific RCT (randomized, sham-controlled), no adverse effects were reported with focused ESWT for chronic lumbar facet joint pain.
The earlier comparative evaluation also reported no serious adverse effects in the shockwave group.
Safety still depends on appropriate screening and clinical judgment—so always consult a licensed provider.
Research specific to lumbar facet pain often used 5 weekly sessions (both in the 2025 focused ESWT trial and the 2014 radial SWT evaluation).
That doesn’t mean “everyone needs exactly five.” It does mean evidence-informed care for this condition is typically delivered as a planned course, not one session.
It can be uncomfortable in irritated areas, but it should be tolerable. Treatment parameters can be adjusted. You’re aiming for “therapeutic intensity,” not suffering. Communication matters—tell your provider what you feel so dosing stays appropriate.
The facet-specific trial enrolled chronic cases (pain lasting long enough to be considered persistent) and found sustained improvements over long-term follow-up in the treatment group.
Chronicity can make pain more complex, but evidence indicates shockwave therapy may still help, especially when facet pain is properly identified and treated with a structured plan.
This depends on medical history, medications, the exact area being treated, pregnancy status, bleeding risk, and other factors. A proper clinical assessment is required. If you have a complex medical history, bring it up before treatment.
Coverage varies by plan and provider. Unpain Clinic can guide you on benefits and documentation, but your insurer makes the final decision. (If you’re unsure, ask for a receipt format and billing codes to submit.)
Side effects are typically mild and may include temporary soreness, tenderness, or a “worked tissue” feeling for a short period. In research on lumbar facet pain and broader chronic low back pain populations, serious adverse events have not been a prominent finding, but individual responses vary.
At Unpain Clinic, we don’t just ask “Where does it hurt?” — we uncover “Why does it hurt?”
If you’ve been frustrated by the cycle of “try everything, feel nothing,” this assessment is for you. We take a whole-body approach so you leave with clarity, not more questions.
✅ What’s Included
Comprehensive history & goal setting
Orthopedic & muscle testing (head-to-toe)
Motion analysis
Imaging decisions (if needed)
Pain pattern mapping
Personalized treatment roadmap
Benefit guidance
🕑 Important Details
60 minutes, assessment only
No treatment in this visit
👩⚕️ Who You’ll See
A licensed Registered Physiotherapist or Chiropractor
🔜 What Happens Next
If you’re a fit, we schedule your first treatment and start executing your plan.
🌟 Why Choose Unpain Clinic
Whole-body assessment, not symptom-chasing
Root-cause focus, not temporary relief
Non-invasive where possible
No long-term upsells — just honest, effective care
🎯 Outcome
You’ll walk out knowing:
What’s wrong
Why it hurts
The fastest path to fix it
Author: Uran Berisha, BSc PT, RMT, Shockwave Expert
1. Nedělka T, Katolický J, Nedělka J, Hobrough P, Knobloch K. Efficacy of high-energy, focused ESWT in treatment of lumbar facet joint pain: a randomized sham-controlled trial. International Journal of Surgery. 2025.
2. Nedelka T, Nedelka J, Schlenker J, Hankins C, Mazanec R. Mechano-transduction effect of shockwaves in the treatment of lumbar facet joint pain: comparative effectiveness evaluation of shockwave therapy, steroid injections and radiofrequency medial branch neurotomy. Neuroendocrinology Letters. 2014.
3. Liu K, Zhang Q, Chen L, et al. Efficacy and safety of extracorporeal shockwave therapy in chronic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 632 patients. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2023.
4. Frontiers in Medicine. Focused extracorporeal shockwave therapy for the treatment of low back pain: a systematic review. 2024.
5. Chen H, Mu G, Fu H, Yue L, Sun H. Comparison of different treatment regimens of extracorporeal shockwave therapy in chronic low-back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Pain Physician. 2022.
Unpain Clinic Podcast Episode #16. Why Cortisone Shots May Not Be Your Best Bet! Exploring Alternative Therapies for Pain Relief. (July 26, 2024).
Unpain Clinic Podcast Episode #15. Pain and Beyond Exploring the Body’s Complexities. (July 18, 2024).
